the truth that they shared the exact same occupation and in the end saw young ones within the photo could not outweigh the “big stuff.” Although they shared typical passions (art and travel), it wasn’t a powerful sufficient foundation for building a married relationship. Since painful they understood that the long-term pain, frustration, and anger would be many times greater were they to marry as they knew the breakup would be in the short term.
In their book Should We Remain Together? Dr. Jeffry Larson lists the facets that predict marital dissatisfaction predicated on 20 years of his or her own research.
So far as a couple’s characteristics are involved, the true number 1 element for marital dissatisfaction is dissimilarity. Similarity does not always mean you both like Indian meals. Similarity doesn’t mean you agree with every subject and not have a positive change of viewpoint. It does signify the greater amount of profound and important the similarities, the more the possibility for enduring joy. This results in values and objectives, because those will be the many profound and similarities that are essential. Larson concludes, “Similarity of backgrounds, values and part orientations in wedding . . . predicts marital satisfaction”.
Let’s face it; it is quite difficult to tell the truth we have a conflict of needs with ourselves when. But we must be real to ourselves for the reason that it’s the only path we shall actually be delighted within the long term. Yes, short-term joy seems great, however it’s gone because quickly as it arrived. Then you must listen to the inner voice, the one that calls out for a reality check if your goal is lasting happiness and inner peace.